Re: History of French
From: Brian M. Scott (b.scott_at_csuohio.edu)
Date: 09/16/04
- Next message: Mark Barratt: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Previous message: Brian M. Scott: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:08:32 -0400
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:16:28 +0200, Mxsmanic
<mxsmanic@hotmail.com> wrote in
<news:ejpjk09f291e5qbovv1m884rmqnk17tqn8@4ax.com> in
sci.lang:
> Brian M. Scott writes:
>> If you knew enough to appreciate such evidence in the first
>> place, you could find it by spending a bit of time at
>> groups.google.com.
> I see arguments like this advanced concerning modern art, and they are
> just as unpersuasive here as they are in that domain.
No, you don't, since I did not advance an argument. You
claimed to want 'evidence that people actually possess the
knowledge they claim to have'; I told you in general terms
where you could find such evidence and gave my opinion that
it wouldn't do you any good.
- Next message: Mark Barratt: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Previous message: Brian M. Scott: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|