Re: History of French
From: Peter T. Daniels (grammatim_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 09/17/04
- Next message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Herman Rubin: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Herman Rubin: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 01:56:01 GMT
Herman Rubin wrote:
>
> In article <p5ugk0ho4ifmbk65kks8cdpmmid3bsn7m7@4ax.com>,
> Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >Ruud Harmsen writes:
>
> >> I never noticed anything PC (poltically correct, that's what you mean,
> >> not Personal Computer?) in what I read about linguistics.
>
> >Every academic domain is rife with PC, unfortunately.
>
> The worst is history; it no longer starts with the
> evolution of ideas, and the military and economic
> events which led to the development, but instead
> the changes are attributed to the lives of peasants
> in the societies. Individuals do not matter.
Looks like you've studied as much historiography as linguistics.
> There are more intellectual Marxists on the social
> science faculties in American universities than in
> the former Soviet Union.
Is that a Bad Thing?
-- Peter T. Daniels grammatim@att.net
- Next message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Herman Rubin: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Herman Rubin: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|