Re: History of French
From: Mxsmanic (mxsmanic_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/17/04
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Nathan Sanders: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Nathan Sanders: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 04:53:09 +0200
Peter T. Daniels writes:
> There is no counterevidence.
But there is. There are people who learn languages perfectly at all
sorts of ages, not just in childhood.
> There is no counterevidence.
See above.
> You anoint yourself a pioneer?
No, I attempt to illustrate logical inconsistences. Sometimes it is
difficult to come up with illustrations sufficiently obvious to be
understood by all.
-- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Nathan Sanders: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Nathan Sanders: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]