Re: History of French
From: Ruud Harmsen (realemailseesite01_at_rudhar.com)
Date: 09/17/04
- Next message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Herman Rubin: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Herman Rubin: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Herman Rubin: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:25:07 +0200
16 Sep 2004 16:50:54 -0500: hrubin@odds.stat.purdue.edu (Herman
Rubin): in sci.lang:
>Children may have to learn that way. The clumsiness is
>perpetuated by those in education who cannot themselves
>understand that an abstract idea is NOT an abstraction,
>but an entity in itself. Grammar is not merely a list
>of what is done, but even in completely oral languages
>became formative.
You are confusing two meanings of the word 'grammar'. Again.
-- Ruud Harmsen - http://rudhar.com
- Next message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Herman Rubin: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Herman Rubin: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Herman Rubin: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|