Re: Nostratic
From: Jacques Guy (jguy_at_alphalink.com.au)
Date: 09/18/04
- Next message: Jacques Guy: "Re: Nostratic"
- Previous message: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Rex F. May: "Re: Nostratic"
- Next in thread: Anti-imperialist: "Deeper relations of Chinese"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 03:34:54 -0700
Rex F. May wrote:
> "Are Chinese and English related?"
But French and Chinese _are_ related. This is
the story our tutor, Mr. Li3 Zhi4hua4, told
us: an explorer is in the Xinjiang desert.
He sees a camel in the distance, and asks
his guide, pointing at the camel: "What
does you call that?" The guide answers:
"Shamo4" ("camel" is "chameau" [Samo] in French).
Some time later, they come across a flock
of sheep and their shepherd. Pointing at
the sheep, the traveller asks: "What do you
call that?" The guide answers: "Mu4tong2"
("mouton" [mutő] is "sheep" in French).
The traveller returns home persuaded
that French and Chinese are related.
And why not? We do say "le vaisseau du désert",
a poetical term for "camel", don't we?
Natural semantic shift, there. Ditto for
"shepherd" and "sheep".
(Key: shamo4 = desert, mu4tong2=shepherd)
- Next message: Jacques Guy: "Re: Nostratic"
- Previous message: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Rex F. May: "Re: Nostratic"
- Next in thread: Anti-imperialist: "Deeper relations of Chinese"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|