Re: Inverted 2 and inverted 3 in Unicode?
From: Miguel Carrasquer (mcv_at_wxs.nl)
Date: 09/18/04
- Next message: Jacques Guy: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: Miguel Carrasquer: "Re: Nostratic"
- In reply to: Harlan Messinger: "Re: Inverted 2 and inverted 3 in Unicode?"
- Next in thread: Harlan Messinger: "Re: Inverted 2 and inverted 3 in Unicode?"
- Reply: Harlan Messinger: "Re: Inverted 2 and inverted 3 in Unicode?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 15:27:59 +0200
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 06:47:08 -0400, Harlan Messinger
<hmessinger.removethis@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Wiktor S." <wswiktor@poczta.fmv> wrote:
>
>>> Another obstacle: What rule would tell software to remove the dot
>>> from the letter "i" before applying a diacritic or accent mark?
>>
>>THE rule of removing the dot before applying an accent. Nothing else.
>
>There's nothing about a font that screams "This part of this glyph is
>a dot!" You can't program software to remove dots if the software has
>no way to know what's a dot.
In practice, the rule would be: before applying a (top)
diacritic, replace the character <i> (U+0069) with the
character <dotless-i> (U+0131).
=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@wxs.nl
- Next message: Jacques Guy: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: Miguel Carrasquer: "Re: Nostratic"
- In reply to: Harlan Messinger: "Re: Inverted 2 and inverted 3 in Unicode?"
- Next in thread: Harlan Messinger: "Re: Inverted 2 and inverted 3 in Unicode?"
- Reply: Harlan Messinger: "Re: Inverted 2 and inverted 3 in Unicode?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|