Re: History of French
From: Brian M. Scott (b.scott_at_csuohio.edu)
Date: 09/18/04
- Next message: Wiktor S.: "Re: Inverted 2 and inverted 3 in Unicode?"
- Previous message: Brian M. Scott: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Peter Dy: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 12:55:55 -0400
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 00:02:42 GMT, Peter Dy
<peterdy@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
<news:CWK2d.22331$ET1.6142@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com> in
sci.lang:
> "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:m56mk0tgome0qbq9i283c037k8o2lf1q6n@4ax.com...
>> Peter Dy writes:
>>> You're hilarious!
>> That's what the learners say, before I begin.
>>> Ok, since it is so easy, tell me how to explain the
>>> "rl" in "world".
>> I usually use diagrams, but all you really have to do is move from that
>> retroflex to the alveolar ridge and you're pretty much there.
> Uh, that's pathetic. Are you joking? That's the worst pronunciation
> description I've ever seen on this NG.
Imagine what his explanation would be like if his own /r/
were 'bunched r' instead of retroflex!
[...]
Brian
- Next message: Wiktor S.: "Re: Inverted 2 and inverted 3 in Unicode?"
- Previous message: Brian M. Scott: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Peter Dy: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|