Re: History of French
From: Ruud Harmsen (realemailseesite01_at_rudhar.com)
Date: 09/18/04
- Next message: Mike Lyle: "Re: Nostratic"
- Previous message: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Peter Dy: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Peter Dy: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Peter Dy: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 22:44:21 +0200
>>> Ok, since it is so easy, tell me how to explain the
>>> "rl" in "world".
>>
>> I usually use diagrams, but all you really have to do is move from that
>> retroflex to the alveolar ridge and you're pretty much there.
Sat, 18 Sep 2004 00:02:42 GMT: "Peter Dy" <peterdy@sbcglobal.net>: in
sci.lang:
>Uh, that's pathetic. Are you joking? That's the worst pronunciation
>description I've ever seen on this NG.
I think it's accurate. What do you think is wrong with it? How would
you improve or correct it?
-- Ruud Harmsen - http://rudhar.com
- Next message: Mike Lyle: "Re: Nostratic"
- Previous message: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Peter Dy: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Peter Dy: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Peter Dy: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|