Re: History of French
From: Mxsmanic (mxsmanic_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/18/04
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Miguel Carrasquer: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Miguel Carrasquer: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Miguel Carrasquer: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 22:50:22 +0200
Miguel Carrasquer writes:
> I don't think it's the first months.
More like the first weeks, if at all.
> If you're suddenly dumped into an environment where you
> don't speak the language, I can't imagine not spending every
> moment of my waking life honing my language skills
> (preferrably in combination with eating, drinking and
> otherwise surviving).
A lot of people will find all sorts of clever ways to avoid learning a
language even in exactly this kind of environment. Some people can live
in such an environment for decades and never learn the local language.
My great-grandmother spent over 70 years of her life in the United
States and never learned any English at all. I don't think it was a
lack of aptitude. And the fact that she still got by demonstrates that
the incentive isn't as strong as one might think.
There's a tremendous difference between not being able to speak any
language and not being able to speak more than one. The former is a
crippling handicap; the latter is an inconvenience.
> My parents had been immersed in Dutch for several years
> before I got around to learning it (in kindergarden). It
> took me just a few months to overtake them. So it's
> definitely not a matter of "how long".
It's a matter of how much they want to learn.
> But I'm sure a child below the threshold age would beat me
> anytime.
I've encountered children in that age group who seem to make little or
no progress in additional languages, perhaps also because of a lack of
motivation.
> Anyway, I think the first few months have nothing to do with
> it. It's been stated that the critical age is 5-7 years.
It has been stated that puberty is the critical age, too. I suppose it
depends on which way the dice roll.
> Is it a coincidence that ca. 5 years is also (at least in my
> case) the age that memory begins?
Nothing special happens to memory at that age. I remember things before
and after that age, and so do most other people I know.
> I have some scattered
> memories of when I was four, but the connected narrative
> doesn't start until age five or so.
I don't have a connected narrative even for last year, much less the age
of five.
> Is that a coincidence,
> or is it a consequence of having acquired language
> "natively", or is it that starting up the "long-term memory
> machine" takes away the capacity of learning new languages
> fast and effortlessly, the "L1 way"? I don't kow.
It's a coincidence.
-- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Miguel Carrasquer: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Miguel Carrasquer: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Miguel Carrasquer: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|