Re: Passion of the Christ, languages
From: Miguel Carrasquer (mcv_at_wxs.nl)
Date: 09/19/04
- Next message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: review of Greenberg Re: Nostratic"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: biblical Hebrew conjugation"
- In reply to: Rasmus Underbjerg Pinnerup: "Re: Passion of the Christ, languages"
- Next in thread: Tron Furu: "Re: Passion of the Christ, languages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 23:41:34 +0200
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 19:38:54 +0200, Rasmus Underbjerg
Pinnerup <pinnerup@*fjerndette*privat.dk> wrote:
>Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@wxs.nl> mælte sligt:
>
>>I would *expect* aspirated. Non-emphatic consonants were
>>probably (optionally) apirated in Proto-Semitic, which is
>>why p, t, k -> f, þ (> s), x, and b, d, g > v, ð, G [...]
>
>Do they need to have been aspirated for lenition to occur, as your
>statement below seems to indicate?
The case is obviously stronger for the voiceless stops, but
the facts allow generalization to all non-emphatics.
=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@wxs.nl
- Next message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: review of Greenberg Re: Nostratic"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: biblical Hebrew conjugation"
- In reply to: Rasmus Underbjerg Pinnerup: "Re: Passion of the Christ, languages"
- Next in thread: Tron Furu: "Re: Passion of the Christ, languages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]