Re: Roots of English language
From: Anti-imperialist (ai_at_anti-imperialist.net)
Date: 09/19/04
- Next message: Jacques Guy: "Re: Deeper relations of Chinese"
- Previous message: Nathan Sanders: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Rex F. May: "Re: Roots of English language"
- Next in thread: Jacques Guy: "Re: Roots of English language"
- Reply: Jacques Guy: "Re: Roots of English language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 16:37:38 -0700
"Ex F. May" wrote:
>
> Just musing, here, but I'd think that if English borrows a Spanish word,
> soy, "rodeo", the Spanish and English words are definitely not cognates.
Right.
> However, if English borrows a word from French that is a cognate to a
> Spanish word -- animal and animal, say, then the words remain cognate even
> after the French word enters English.
Agree.
>
> Question. Take yo and ego. Are they cognates? Io and yo (Italian and
> Spanish) definitely are, but is a word -descended- from a word cognate to it
> or not?
Think so....they are all related. Has to do with relatedness.
-- The ultimate analysis of the Iraqi resistance; lists and analyzes 100 (!) Iraqi insurgent groups: http://www.iraq-news-net.de/?/news/inn-statements/ The Jewish People's Liberation Organization (JPLO) http://tinyurl.com/2jkeo The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) http://www.pflp.net/
- Next message: Jacques Guy: "Re: Deeper relations of Chinese"
- Previous message: Nathan Sanders: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Rex F. May: "Re: Roots of English language"
- Next in thread: Jacques Guy: "Re: Roots of English language"
- Reply: Jacques Guy: "Re: Roots of English language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]