Re: Deeper relations of Chinese
From: Jacques Guy (jguy_at_alphalink.com.au)
Date: 09/20/04
- Next message: Jacques Guy: "Re: Roots of English language"
- Previous message: Anti-imperialist: "Re: Roots of English language"
- In reply to: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Deeper relations of Chinese"
- Next in thread: Anti-imperialist: "Re: Deeper relations of Chinese"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:45:20 -0700
Peter T. Daniels wrote:
> If we don't post the reply to the newsgroup they're reading, they don't
> see the reply.
>
> (Or do you want them here permanently?)
In that case, let's instead remove sci.lang from the newsgroups
line, and leave only alt.blah-blah-blah or whatever.
At any rate, what good is it for them to see the replies?
They're just a bunch of thick-skulled dimwits. You don't
argue with people who want to believe bull*** anymore
than you'd argue with microbes.
- Next message: Jacques Guy: "Re: Roots of English language"
- Previous message: Anti-imperialist: "Re: Roots of English language"
- In reply to: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Deeper relations of Chinese"
- Next in thread: Anti-imperialist: "Re: Deeper relations of Chinese"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]