Re: History of French
From: Ruud Harmsen (realemailseesite01_at_rudhar.com)
Date: 09/20/04
- Next message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: Jacques Guy: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Nathan Sanders: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Jacques Guy: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Jacques Guy: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:23:59 +0200
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 00:21:58 GMT: Nathan Sanders
<nsanders.DIE.SPAM@wso.williams.edu>: in sci.lang:
>Supposing that language ability is primarily controlled by desire to
>learn, as you have suggested: Is it a coincidence that every single
>child on earth has a strong desire to learn and successfully becomes a
>native speaker with little active effort (no sitting at a desk reading
>pages of grammar rules, for example), but that nearly all L2 learners
>lack the desire to achieve the same result, even with decades of
>active studying?
No, there must be reasons for that. But that's not the question. The
question is: is 'critical period' the most important reason? Or even
an important reason? And that to me seems difficult to prove. I
haven't seen anything convincing in this thread. And Genie doesn't
prove nothing concerning this.
-- Ruud Harmsen - http://rudhar.com
- Next message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: Jacques Guy: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Nathan Sanders: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Jacques Guy: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Jacques Guy: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|