Re: History of French
From: Nathan Sanders (nsanders.DIE.SPAM_at_wso.williams.edu)
Date: 09/20/04
- Next message: Jacques Guy: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: Jacques Guy: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Jacques Guy: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:07:35 GMT
In article <414F8585.C69@alphalink.com.au>,
Jacques Guy <jguy@alphalink.com.au> wrote:
> > Mon, 20 Sep 2004 00:21:58 GMT: Nathan Sanders
> > <nsanders.DIE.SPAM@wso.williams.edu>: in sci.lang:
>
> > > Is it a coincidence that every single
> > > child on earth has a strong desire to learn
>
> until you have brought evidence that "every single child
> on earth has a strong desire to learn" yours is nothing
> but an empty "it is so because I say so" argument.
You're confusing me with mxsmanic, who believes that desire is one of
the primary factors distinguishing L1 from L2 learning. You've also
snipped the relevant context that makes it clear how my quote fits
into the disucssion as questioning his position, not affirming it.
Nathan
-- Nathan Sanders Linguistics Program nsanders@wso.williams.edu Williams College http://wso.williams.edu/~nsanders Williamstown, MA 01267
- Next message: Jacques Guy: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: Jacques Guy: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Jacques Guy: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|