Re: Deeper relations of Chinese

From: Rex F. May (rex.may_at_comcast.net)
Date: 09/21/04 

Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:00:37 GMT

in article 414F1125.3273D6B0@anti-imperialist.net, Anti-imperialist at
ai@anti-imperialist.net wrote on 9/20/04 11:19 AM:

> Isn't that pretty silly on its face? Parallel development?

 Hm. don't think so. Single-origin stuff is usually considered the stuff
of crackpottery in other fields. Except for Peter's point, I don't see any
evidence one way or the other.

Quantcast