Re: History of French
From: Ruud Harmsen (realemailseesite01_at_rudhar.com)
Date: 09/21/04
- Next message: Anti-imperialist: "Re: Languages of Africa"
- Previous message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Chergarj: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Chergarj: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Chergarj: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:03:11 +0200
21 Sep 2004 20:42:47 GMT: chergarj@cs.comhaho (Chergarj): in sci.lang:
>In this set of messages on History of French, we have seen comments on many
>things, including accents and grammar.
>
>Is it reasonable enough to say that grammar is built into a persons natural
>language behavior so that the native speaker projects what he says with
>(usually) very good or even perfect grammar because the language behavior has
>become ingrained so that the speaker does not have to think about it?
I think so, yes.
BTW, a lot of this is necessary and achievable in second language
learning as well. Practical usage of a second language isn't very well
possible if you constantly have to refer to dictionaries and grammar
books.
-- Ruud Harmsen - http://rudhar.com
- Next message: Anti-imperialist: "Re: Languages of Africa"
- Previous message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Chergarj: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Chergarj: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Chergarj: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]