Re: History of French
From: Chergarj (chergarj_at_cs.comhaho)
Date: 09/21/04
- Next message: alexV: "Re: Phonics, was: History of French"
- Previous message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: second person in Brazilian Portuguese"
- In reply to: Nathan Sanders: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Nathan Sanders: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 21 Sep 2004 21:13:16 GMT
This is the answer to one of my questions -
nsanders.DIE.SPAM@wso.williams.edu states quite bluntly:
>Much of grammar isn't even noticeable because it's so automatic.
>
(note, I asked about it in another set of messages on History of French)
G C
- Next message: alexV: "Re: Phonics, was: History of French"
- Previous message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: second person in Brazilian Portuguese"
- In reply to: Nathan Sanders: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Nathan Sanders: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]