Re: History of French
From: Nathan Sanders (nsanders.DIE.SPAM_at_wso.williams.edu)
Date: 09/23/04
- Next message: Jacques Guy: "Chromatics was Phonics, was: History of French"
- Previous message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Poetry Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Jacques Guy: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Jacques Guy: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Herman Rubin: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 03:44:32 GMT
In article <clg4l0tcujtg3kj5nuugpisu2eeiqjmf6v@4ax.com>,
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Just because something is said doesn't make it correct (although I
Do you mean "correct" or "standard", or perhaps, "correct in the
standard language"?
If either of the latter two, then I agree 100%.
> suppose there are some highly liberal and PC linguists who would
> disagree).
What do politics have to do with it? Conservative linguists (and
moderate linguists, and apolitical linguists) would disagree with your
statement just as much as liberal linguists would.
If native speakers of language L say X in L, then X is correct in L.
X is not necessarily correct in a different language (which includes
the standard form of L), of course,.
Nathan
-- Nathan Sanders Linguistics Program nsanders@wso.williams.edu Williams College http://wso.williams.edu/~nsanders Williamstown, MA 01267
- Next message: Jacques Guy: "Chromatics was Phonics, was: History of French"
- Previous message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Poetry Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Jacques Guy: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Jacques Guy: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: History of French"
- Reply: Herman Rubin: "Re: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|