Immutability of computer languages nee History of French
From: Jacques Guy (jguy_at_alphalink.com.au)
Date: 09/24/04
- Next message: George Lucki: "Re: More stupidities"
- Previous message: Geoff: "Re: Is 恩 a "closer" pronunciation of /un/ in " under" than 安? Re: 音標裡面的一個音"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Ron Hardin: "Re: Immutability of computer languages nee History of French"
- Reply: Ron Hardin: "Re: Immutability of computer languages nee History of French"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: Immutability of computer languages nee History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:20:18 -0700
Mxsmanic wrote:
> The FORTRAN of 40 years ago will still
> compile cleanly today.
[about Fortan 90]
"Yet even with these dramatic enhancements to previous
versions of Fortran, an exceptionally high degree of backward
compatibility is maintained."
(http://www.sali.freeservers.com/engineering/fortran.html)
A "high degree of backward compatibility" is not full backward
compatibility.
Anyway, even FORTRAN IV was not backward-compatible:
"A FORTRAN II to FORTRAN IV translator was used to retain backward
compatibility with earlier FORTRAN programs."
(http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/languages/fortran/ch1-1.html)
> In computerland, the more
> things change, the more they remain the same, and there's really nothing
> new under the sun.
Yeah, there is no evolution, since it's all Intelligent Design.
- Next message: George Lucki: "Re: More stupidities"
- Previous message: Geoff: "Re: Is 恩 a "closer" pronunciation of /un/ in " under" than 安? Re: 音標裡面的一個音"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: History of French"
- Next in thread: Ron Hardin: "Re: Immutability of computer languages nee History of French"
- Reply: Ron Hardin: "Re: Immutability of computer languages nee History of French"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: Immutability of computer languages nee History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|