Re: Immutability of computer languages nee History of French
From: Mxsmanic (mxsmanic_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/24/04
- Next message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Immutability of computer languages nee History of French"
- In reply to: Ron Hardin: "Re: Immutability of computer languages nee History of French"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: Immutability of computer languages nee History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 18:59:31 +0200
Ron Hardin writes:
> Then there is backward compatibility - the political problem that backward people
> object when their programs stop compiling, so you have to temporarily accept both the old
> and new constructions. This leads to a paradox : there are compilers that accept
> only the old construction, and here are compilers that accept both the old and
> the new construction. Which one is the actual standard? The old construction.
> All compilers accept it. The new construction works only on new compilers.
Quite so.
-- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
- Next message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: History of French"
- Previous message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Immutability of computer languages nee History of French"
- In reply to: Ron Hardin: "Re: Immutability of computer languages nee History of French"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: Immutability of computer languages nee History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|