Re: Chromatics was Phonics, was: History of French
From: Brian M. Scott (b.scott_at_csuohio.edu)
Date: 09/25/04
- Next message: alexV: "Re: Stanley Fish"
- Previous message: gAzor: "Re: how come slavs have ridiculously consonant packed names?"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: Chromatics was Phonics, was: History of French"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: Chromatics was Phonics, was: History of French"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: Chromatics was Phonics, was: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:46:49 -0400
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 18:57:39 +0200, Mxsmanic
<mxsmanic@hotmail.com> wrote in
<news:8fk8l0h1238id5i691jo72btk40jadd6ob@4ax.com> in
sci.lang:
> Paul J Kriha writes:
>> What has learning a language to do with decoding Navaho military
>> messages by a cryptologist?
> Doing so would require learning a language (Navaho).
If you're making a claim about this specific code, you'll
need to support it, since there are counterexamples to the
more general claim that it is necessary to know the source
language in order to cryptanalyze a message.
[...]
- Next message: alexV: "Re: Stanley Fish"
- Previous message: gAzor: "Re: how come slavs have ridiculously consonant packed names?"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: Chromatics was Phonics, was: History of French"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: Chromatics was Phonics, was: History of French"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: Chromatics was Phonics, was: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|