Re: Chromatics was Phonics, was: History of French
From: Mxsmanic (mxsmanic_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/25/04
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Immutability of computer languages nee History of French"
- Previous message: Nathan Sanders: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Brian M. Scott: "Re: Chromatics was Phonics, was: History of French"
- Next in thread: Paul J Kriha: "Re: Chromatics was Phonics, was: History of French"
- Reply: Paul J Kriha: "Re: Chromatics was Phonics, was: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 05:12:41 +0200
Brian M. Scott writes:
> If you're making a claim about this specific code, you'll
> need to support it, since there are counterexamples to the
> more general claim that it is necessary to know the source
> language in order to cryptanalyze a message.
It can be done, but there are caveats. The problem is in the human link
that has to interpret the speech. If you can mechanize that, it can go
much faster.
-- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Immutability of computer languages nee History of French"
- Previous message: Nathan Sanders: "Re: History of French"
- In reply to: Brian M. Scott: "Re: Chromatics was Phonics, was: History of French"
- Next in thread: Paul J Kriha: "Re: Chromatics was Phonics, was: History of French"
- Reply: Paul J Kriha: "Re: Chromatics was Phonics, was: History of French"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
