Re: Fool's-object ``whom''
From: Greg Lee (greg_at_ling.lll.hawaii.edu)
Date: 09/29/04
- Next message: benlizross: "Re: Nursing"
- Previous message: Miguel Carrasquer: "Re: gender in indo-european languages"
- In reply to: Ron Hardin: "Re: Fool's-object ``whom''"
- Next in thread: Ron Hardin: "Re: Fool's-object ``whom''"
- Reply: Ron Hardin: "Re: Fool's-object ``whom''"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 29 Sep 2004 21:08:02 GMT
Ron Hardin <rhhardin@mindspring.com> wrote:
> Greg Lee wrote:
> > I don't understand how ``whom'' could be tentatively parsed as
> > the object of ``rethink''. Are there other examples where ``whom''
> > is actually the object of preceding ``rethink''? Or where any
> > animate noun phrase is the object of ``rethink''?
> A: You might want to rethink the soprano.
Yes, if it means the soprano line in music, or choice of
a certain person to sing the soprano part, or perhaps the
appropriateness of a soprano saxophone. But then it's
not an animate noun phrase, and
> B: (request for repeat) Rethink whom?
the question would be: Rethink what?
-- Greg Lee <greg@ling.lll.hawaii.edu>
- Next message: benlizross: "Re: Nursing"
- Previous message: Miguel Carrasquer: "Re: gender in indo-european languages"
- In reply to: Ron Hardin: "Re: Fool's-object ``whom''"
- Next in thread: Ron Hardin: "Re: Fool's-object ``whom''"
- Reply: Ron Hardin: "Re: Fool's-object ``whom''"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]