Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?
From: Aidan Kehoe (kehoea_at_parhasard.net)
Date: 10/06/04
- Next message: the Omrud: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Previous message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: Questions about Sports Pronunciations"
- Maybe in reply to: The Green Troll: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Next in thread: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Reply: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 08:53:15 +0100
"Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@worldnet.att.net> writes:
> _Any_ discussion of "language vs. dialect" is not a question of
> linguistics, but of politics.
Ah, be exact, Peter. It's a question of both. Don't you think Franco would
have promoted Basque as a dialect if he had a chance of being believed?
Abstand vs. Ausbau, etc.
-- Like the early Christians, Marx expected the millennium very soon; like their successors, his have been disappointed--once more, the world has shown itself recalcitrant to a tidy formula embodying the hopes of some section of mankind. (Russell)
- Next message: the Omrud: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Previous message: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: Questions about Sports Pronunciations"
- Maybe in reply to: The Green Troll: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Next in thread: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Reply: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|