Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?
From: Peter T. Daniels (grammatim_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 10/06/04
- Next message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Seen on aus.politics"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: ts in Tagalog"
- In reply to: Aidan Kehoe: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Next in thread: Ross Howard: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Reply: Ross Howard: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Reply: Aidan Kehoe: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 11:16:01 GMT
Aidan Kehoe wrote:
>
> "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@worldnet.att.net> writes:
>
> > _Any_ discussion of "language vs. dialect" is not a question of
> > linguistics, but of politics.
>
> Ah, be exact, Peter. It's a question of both. Don't you think Franco would
> have promoted Basque as a dialect if he had a chance of being believed?
> Abstand vs. Ausbau, etc.
I have no idea what you're referring to. Nor do I have any insight into
the mind of the Generalissimo, who is still dead.
-- Peter T. Daniels grammatim@att.net
- Next message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Seen on aus.politics"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: ts in Tagalog"
- In reply to: Aidan Kehoe: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Next in thread: Ross Howard: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Reply: Ross Howard: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Reply: Aidan Kehoe: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|