Re: Lolita in China
From: Ron Hardin (rhhardin_at_mindspring.com)
Date: 10/08/04
- Next message: Mike Lyle: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Previous message: Prai Jei: "Re: Fish - PIE - Linguistic Help Please"
- In reply to: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Lolita in China"
- Next in thread: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Lolita in China"
- Reply: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Lolita in China"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 18:53:39 GMT
Peter T. Daniels wrote:
>
> Ron Hardin wrote:
> >
> > Peter T. Daniels wrote:
> > >
> > > Ron Hardin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Peter T. Daniels wrote:
> > > > > > > Why do you expect to find English grammatical categories in Cantonese?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > One of the ways taboo words are transgressive is of grammatical categories.
> > > > >
> > > > > How is that an apt response to the question?
> > > >
> > > > Whether it's an ordinary word or transgressive of categories was the question.
> > >
> > > > On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk.
> > >
> > > No, the question was, "Why do you expect to find English grammatical
> > > categories in Cantonese?"
> >
> > I don't. Why do you?
>
> > On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk.
>
> You're pretending to be Dan Rather?
>
> You described the Cantonese expression in terms of English grammatical
> categories.
To an English speaker.
-- Ron Hardin rhhardin@mindspring.com On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk.
- Next message: Mike Lyle: "Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?"
- Previous message: Prai Jei: "Re: Fish - PIE - Linguistic Help Please"
- In reply to: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Lolita in China"
- Next in thread: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Lolita in China"
- Reply: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Lolita in China"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|