Re: ``We didn't find something.''
From: Greg Lee (greg_at_ling.lll.hawaii.edu)
Date: 10/11/04
- Next message: Ron Hardin: "Re: ``We didn't find something.''"
- Previous message: Jugoslav Dujic: "Re: Words with multiple meanings across languages"
- In reply to: Ron Hardin: "Re: ``We didn't find something.''"
- Next in thread: Ron Hardin: "Re: ``We didn't find something.''"
- Reply: Ron Hardin: "Re: ``We didn't find something.''"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 11 Oct 2004 12:29:43 GMT
Ron Hardin <rhhardin@mindspring.com> wrote:
...
> Formal logic reduces natural language to something it is not. So the map doesn't go
> back to natural language.
Formal logic is a syntactic theory of natural language that describes
scope relations very well. That is its strong point.
> In particular, ``find'' can't be isolated from its object by saying it's
> negated separately.
Who said it was negated separately?
> Finding something and not finding something aren't relatd that
> way.
Who said they were? Negation in predicate logic applies to sentences, not
to predicates.
...
-- Greg Lee <greg@ling.lll.hawaii.edu>
- Next message: Ron Hardin: "Re: ``We didn't find something.''"
- Previous message: Jugoslav Dujic: "Re: Words with multiple meanings across languages"
- In reply to: Ron Hardin: "Re: ``We didn't find something.''"
- Next in thread: Ron Hardin: "Re: ``We didn't find something.''"
- Reply: Ron Hardin: "Re: ``We didn't find something.''"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|