Re: Branch of English or a Separate Language?

From: Jackie Mulheron (JackieMulheron_at_aol.com)
Date: 10/25/04 

Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 23:58:32 +0100

"Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@att.net> wrote in message
news:417B9E97.3E38@att.net...
> Jackie Mulheron wrote:
>>
>> "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
>> news:417A61F7.7E93@worldnet.att.net...
>> > Jackie Mulheron wrote:
>> >>
>> >> "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
>> >> news:41784C30.7D8E@worldnet.att.net...
>> >> > Jackie Mulheron wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> > That's what, the seventeenth time you've made that claim about
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > so-called FAQ, which no one has seen in several years? Quote the
>> >> >> > relevant passage (not that a FAQ is legislation -- there's some
>> >> >> > other
>> >> >> > sort of foundational document that lays out the scope of a
>> >> >> > newsgroup)
>> >> >> > or
>> >> >> > shut up.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Allen posted the relevant passage if you were keeping up.
>> >> >
>> >> > I have responded to that twice.
>> >>
>> >> So you are now aware that your constant complaints are just your
>> >> personal
>> >> preferences rather than anything to do with the ng's scope.
>> >
>> > I have not seen the alleged passage from the FAQ, which would have no
>> > say in the "scope" of the NG in the first place.
>>
>> So after saying you responded twice to Allen's citing of the FAQ you're
>> now
>> saying you didn't?
>
> No, idiot.

Oooh. Ad hominen. Is that allowed in sci.lang?

> I responded twice to your claim that Allen cited it and that
> I saw it there.

And you also responded to Allen when he cited the relevant parts of it. Have
you forgotten?

>> Are you trolling?
>>
>> >> > If you're too lazy to do your own research
>> >>
>> >> You're the one seeking the information.
>> >
>> > You're the one who claim it was posted and base unwarranted assertions
>> > on it.
>>
>> You're the one who claims you responded to it twice.
>
> I responded twice to your claim that Allen cited it and that I saw it
> there.

And as I've just said you responded to Allen when he quoted it.

>> >> > go away.
>> >>
>> >> I don't have to go anywhere. You're the one letting this into your
>> >> world.
>> >
>> > I have no control over who posts here; only you can stop your posting
>> > here.
>>
>> And only you can stop yourself from reading them.

Relevant Pages