Re: OT: A Better Keyboard
From: Asetnil (skearney_at_accessbee.com)
Date: 11/02/04
- Next message: Asetnil: "Re: OT: A Better Keyboard"
- Previous message: Asetnil: "Re: OT: A Better Keyboard"
- In reply to: Stefano MacGregor: "Re: OT: A Better Keyboard"
- Next in thread: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: OT: A Better Keyboard"
- Reply: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: OT: A Better Keyboard"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 1 Nov 2004 22:22:44 -0800
esperantujo@yahoo.com (Stefano MacGregor) wrote in message news:<6b9b63b5.0411010837.79069ce4@posting.google.com>...
> skearney@accessbee.com (Asetnil) wrote in message news:<a8dc57d5.0410301535.4dce2769@posting.google.com>...
>
> > Christopher Latham Sholes, the typewriter inventor, originally put
> > 'e' on the home row. In normal typing, collisions between print bars
> > became inevitable. His 1868 version was a conscious attempt to cause
> > typing to be slower. It has been universal ever since.
>
> Others have mentioned the Dvorak keyboard, so I'll just add a little
> information here:
>
> Dvorak actually came up with =three= keyboard layouts. The one people
> are talking about is the most common of those, intended for people
> with two hands. There are also keyboards for people with only one
> hand, mirror-images of each other.
>
> Dvorak's original had digits divided, odd on one hand, even on the
> other. As currently implemented, the digits are in the same locations
> as on the Qwerty keyboard.
>
> Here's an idea: Congress should pass a law in this country requiring
> that keyboards of all types should have a Qwerty/Dvorak switch, so
> that all typewriters, computers, Linotype machines, etc., are
> Dvorak-capable. Then, people learning typing could learn the Dvorak
> layout (even though the keyboards would still be labeled Qwerty-wise)
> and count on being able to use any keyboard they would encounter.
> Later, when many people are using it, manufacturers could label the
> keys Dvorak-style, but we old farts who can't relearn typing could
> flip the switch and still touch-type Qwerty-wise. Eventually, rescind
> the law, when no one uses Qwerty any more.
In the above posts, Harlan, Peter and Lee point out that the
Dvorak option is available in the windows, apple and linux operating
systems. Given the simplicity and small memory requirements, why not
offer the asetnil option as well?
- Next message: Asetnil: "Re: OT: A Better Keyboard"
- Previous message: Asetnil: "Re: OT: A Better Keyboard"
- In reply to: Stefano MacGregor: "Re: OT: A Better Keyboard"
- Next in thread: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: OT: A Better Keyboard"
- Reply: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: OT: A Better Keyboard"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|