Re: Origin of Chinese spoken languages - bye for now

From: Dylan Sung (dylanwhs.tsktsktsk_at_pacific.net.hk)
Date: 11/02/04 

Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 15:41:49 -0000

"SJ" <aniso_bipolar@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95954CEBA424Edonotsendspamnet@131.118.254.130...
> "Dylan Sung" <dylanwhs.tsktsktsk@pacific.net.hk> wrote in
> news:2uour4F2ckec9U1@uni-berlin.de:
>
>>
>>"SJ" <donot@send.spam.net> wrote in message
>>news:Xns9594E7FA28A67donotsendspamnet@131.118.254.130...
>>> "Dylan Sung" <dylanwhs.tsktsktsk@pacific.net.hk> wrote in
>>> news:2unvckF2a99c1U1@uni-berlin.de:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"SJ" <donot@send.spam.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:Xns95949D63A3182donotsendspamnet@131.118.254.130...
>>>>> I have been doing several other activities, and frankly speaking I
>>>>> was also tired (bored) a little bit. It may take more days for me
>>>>> to figure out the 8-th evidence.
>>>>>
>>>>> SJ.
>>>>
>>>>You're making it up as you go along?
>>>>
>>>>Dyl.
>>>
>>> What do you mean?
>>>
>>> SJ.
>>
>>You need an explanation? Well, ok, here's what I conclude from your
>>frank statement above.
>>
>>You've not figured out the 8th evidence. You've got more I would
>>imagine. Since you've not got it all figured out, you're in the process
>>of making things up in your theory as you go along!
>>
>>Dyl.
>
> Idiot. Is it strange to you?

My, you're irritated. I'm getting under you skin am I?

>
> I am not simply copying materials from books or papers.

Did I say you were?

>
> I, like others, have many ideas and yet did not detail it in a shape. I
> will shape it if I have time to spare. Of course, I will update the past
> 7 evidences, accepting some feedbacks and critical comments. I already
> stated that I opened my evidences to revision and enhancement. I am a
> open-minded person. I am not a God who already completed making all
> things up.
>
> SJ.

It's usual in science when putting forward a theory with all the supporting
evidence is present, well argued and addresses the problems of theories in
the past. Any variance to the theory ought to be explained in the framework
of the theory presented and shown why such variance occurs. When you haven't
finished presenting your evidence, or do not know how many more pieces of
evidence you are going to bring, then surely, your theory is incomplete.

Given the problems so far, when do you predict your theory being correct?

Dyl.