Re: Origin of Chinese spoken languages - 6th evidence
From: Peter T. Daniels (grammatim_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 11/12/04
- Next message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Seen at http://www.theage.com.au"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: And now: optical lunacy"
- In reply to: Paul Kekai Manansala: "Re: Origin of Chinese spoken languages - 6th evidence"
- Next in thread: Paul Kekai Manansala: "Re: Origin of Chinese spoken languages - 6th evidence"
- Reply: Paul Kekai Manansala: "Re: Origin of Chinese spoken languages - 6th evidence"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:29:04 GMT
Paul Kekai Manansala wrote:
> Of course, there are still millions of Amerindian speakers down there
> and they are among the fastest growing populations. Many of the
> smaller languages will die out simply because the group itself will
> cease to exist, but I think thousands of years from now the Amerindian
> languages will still be around.
>
> The number of languages will be smaller but I believe the proportion
> of speakers to the overall population will be larger. The general
> estimate for Amerindian speakers in L. America is 20-25 million
> although I think the number is much larger.
Are you including Mexico?
Otherwise, only Quechua, Aymara, and Guaraní seem viable.
-- Peter T. Daniels grammatim@att.net
- Next message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Seen at http://www.theage.com.au"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: And now: optical lunacy"
- In reply to: Paul Kekai Manansala: "Re: Origin of Chinese spoken languages - 6th evidence"
- Next in thread: Paul Kekai Manansala: "Re: Origin of Chinese spoken languages - 6th evidence"
- Reply: Paul Kekai Manansala: "Re: Origin of Chinese spoken languages - 6th evidence"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|