Re: Lunacy++
From: James Kanze (james.kanze_at_free.fr)
Date: 11/14/04
- Next message: James Kanze: "Re: Lunacy++"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Drifting phonemes [was: Re: The AmE 'o' sound]"
- In reply to: LEE Sau Dan: "Re: Lunacy++"
- Next in thread: AlexV: "Re: Lunacy++"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 14 Nov 2004 02:15:04 +0100
LEE Sau Dan <danlee@informatik.uni-freiburg.de> writes:
|> >>>>> "Jacques" == Jacques Guy <jguy@alphalink.com.au> writes:
|> Jacques> No. There is nothing about requiring any prior
|> Jacques> programming experience, and it was sold in the popular
|> Jacques> computer magazine section of all newsagents. It is 112
|> Jacques> pages long, and Chapter 29 (two pages) is a glossary
|> Jacques> with such entries as "bit", "byte", "definition",
|> What? It defines "definition"? :)
In the C++ language, definition has a particular definition. It's not
just your plain everyday definition.
--
James Kanze
Conseils en informatique orientée objet/
Beratung in objektorientierter Datenverarbeitung
9 place Pierre Sémard, 78210 St.-Cyr-l'École, France +33 (0)1 30 23 00 34
- Next message: James Kanze: "Re: Lunacy++"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Drifting phonemes [was: Re: The AmE 'o' sound]"
- In reply to: LEE Sau Dan: "Re: Lunacy++"
- Next in thread: AlexV: "Re: Lunacy++"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]