Re: Lunacy++
From: James Kanze (james.kanze_at_free.fr)
Date: 11/14/04
- Next message: Bob Cunningham: "[&] and [a] & lax and tense [was: Re: Claims [was: Re: Drifting phonemes [was: Re: The AmE 'o' sound]]]"
- Previous message: James Kanze: "Re: Lunacy++"
- In reply to: AlexV: "Re: Lunacy++"
- Next in thread: Jacques Guy: "Re: Lunacy++"
- Reply: Jacques Guy: "Re: Lunacy++"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 14 Nov 2004 02:20:54 +0100
"AlexV" <alexV@comcast.net> writes:
|> "Jacques Guy" <jguy@alphalink.com.au> wrote in message
|> news:41934721.3E37@alphalink.com.au...
|> > Out of a small book "Programming in C++"
|> > by Mark Greenway and Julian Kelsey, in
|> > the beginner's section, the beginner is
|> > introduced to "The simplest C++ Program:
|> > Hello world!". Six lines (the last one
|> > just "}"), and here is the second line:
|> > #include <iostream>
[...]
|> I think you have an exuberance problem, though. This post is not
|> funny at all and you do not understand it. What you quoted is a
|> professional text not for a common man. If you are looking for
|> styles you should not read C++.
I have more than a few collegues who would disagree with you. And in
fact, with a bit of discipline, it is possible to write elegant programs
in C++. (I don't think that is what you meant, but that is what it
seems to say.)
|> I am writing this post out of my sense of a fair play. What you are
|> doing is unfair. There is absolutely nothing wrong with this text at
|> all. I am familiar with C++ and have read and written many programs
|> myself. Every single word in this text for beginners is in place.
I am considered an expert in C++ myself, and I would certainly disagree.
Technical books can be well written. Consider something like "C++
Templates, The Complete Guide" (Vandevoorde and Josuttis) -- it covers a
very advanced and very difficult topic, and is never the less very well
written.
To this day, I'm convinced that the main reason C became as popular as
it did is because Kernighan was such a skilled writer -- it certainly
isn't because of any quality in the language itself.
--
James Kanze
Conseils en informatique orientée objet/
Beratung in objektorientierter Datenverarbeitung
9 place Pierre Sémard, 78210 St.-Cyr-l'École, France +33 (0)1 30 23 00 34
- Next message: Bob Cunningham: "[&] and [a] & lax and tense [was: Re: Claims [was: Re: Drifting phonemes [was: Re: The AmE 'o' sound]]]"
- Previous message: James Kanze: "Re: Lunacy++"
- In reply to: AlexV: "Re: Lunacy++"
- Next in thread: Jacques Guy: "Re: Lunacy++"
- Reply: Jacques Guy: "Re: Lunacy++"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|