Re: Speaking without a foreign accent
From: Richard Herring (junk_at_[127.0.0.1)
Date: 11/16/04
- Next message: Jacques Guy: "Re: PC clock, was: "The phoneme concept" [was: Re: Claims [was: Re: Drifting phonemes [was: Re: The AmE 'o' sound]]]"
- Previous message: Bob Cunningham: "Re: Another Daniels screwup [was: Re: Claims [was: Re: Drifting phonemes [was: Re: The AmE 'o' sound]]]"
- In reply to: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Speaking without a foreign accent"
- Next in thread: Nathan Sanders: "Re: Speaking without a foreign accent"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:41:20 +0000
In message <4199F6CA.3D4F@worldnet.att.net>, Peter T. Daniels
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> writes
>Nathan Sanders wrote:
>>
>> In article <k35ip0pigbfu2qmpvclek7qnliropd6ccg@4ax.com>,
>> Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Nathan Sanders writes:
>> >
>> > > The impossibility of proving there is not God does not lie in the
>> > > negation, but in the inherent properties of God.
>> >
>> > Then prove that there are no pink unicorns.
>>
>> Congratulations, you missed the point again. Are you trying for a
>> medal? (See footnote for some fitting options.)
>
>And I was so looking forward to that footnote ...
It's there; you just can't see it.
-- Richard Herring
- Next message: Jacques Guy: "Re: PC clock, was: "The phoneme concept" [was: Re: Claims [was: Re: Drifting phonemes [was: Re: The AmE 'o' sound]]]"
- Previous message: Bob Cunningham: "Re: Another Daniels screwup [was: Re: Claims [was: Re: Drifting phonemes [was: Re: The AmE 'o' sound]]]"
- In reply to: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Speaking without a foreign accent"
- Next in thread: Nathan Sanders: "Re: Speaking without a foreign accent"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
