Re: Phaistos Disk side B
From: grapheus (grapheus_at_www.com)
Date: 11/18/04
- Next message: Jacques Guy: "Re: Phaistos Disk side B = brain rotter"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Chinese dictation"
- In reply to: Jacques Guy: "Phaistos Disk side B"
- Next in thread: Rolleston: "Re: Phaistos Disk side B"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 18 Nov 2004 09:53:42 -0800
Jacques Guy <jguy@alphalink.com.au> wrote in message news:<419C7186.7BFB@alphalink.com.au>...
> Now that I have found my "treasured" copy of the famous
> decipherment by the famous scholar, I used dejanews to
> retrieve:
>
> > "Des Small" <des.small@bristol.ac.uk> wrote in message
> > news:yyrj1xf1u9gk.fsf@pc156.maths.bris.ac.uk...
>
> > > In the message with ID <95lomb$9v9$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (which bears your
> > > name) of that date:
> > >
> > > """
> > > Jean Faucounau says that only the original of the Phaistos Disk
> > > counts, but he shows no photograph of side B, only a drawing, which he
> > > manipulated by replacing an original pictogram that appears twice on
> > > side B and only on side B (Evans 20) by a different drawing of his
> > > own. He claims to be a scholar, but he is a hobby linguist, and his
> > > cheating turns him in a kook.
> > > """
>
> Indeed there are no photographs of the disk, only two drawings pp.8 and
> 6,
> purported to be "d'après Evans".
So, where is the "cheating" repeated again and again by Franz ????
If there is a "cheater", it has to be A. Evans !!!!!
> The closest things to "photographs"
> are appallingly poor-quality black-and-white... what? rubbings?... of
> individual signs or groups of signs, pp.68, 74, 76, 78, 130, 133, 134,
> 136, 138, 142, 144.
Quote of the page 17 of the book (translation and emphasis are mine) :
"One will notice that the photographies are given here JUST TO GIVE to
the reader an IDEA of the reality. We sharply urge the reader to look
at the photographical editions... etc.
Where is the"cheating" repeated again and again by Franz ????
> Now I don't know what "Evans 20" might be.
See on page 10 !..
And tel WHERE the "CHEATING", mentioned again and again by Franz, IS
!...
>If
> the grrreat scholar follows Evan's nomenclature, that is the sign
> that looks like a conch shell (pp.84-85). However, there are no such
> signs on the drawing of face B p.9.
BECAUSE it is said that this DRAWING is "FROM EVANS" !!!.
Where is the "cheating" ????
>Further, the grrreat scholar
> writes p. 85, next to a drawing of the "conch shell": "Evans...
> vit dans ce sign un 'vase muni d'une anse'"
WHY DID YOU CUT THE ENTIRE SENTENCE ?...
Here it is (translation and emphasis are mine) : ""Evans saw this sign
as "a vase with one handle. THIS INTERPRETATION DOESN'T CORRECTLY
CORRESPOND TO THE REAL DRAWING".
Where is the "cheating", repeated again and again by Franz ????
> And Evan's drawing of
> side B does indeed show two signs looking like a flat-bottomed
> amphora with a handle, one in group 5, the other in group 13.
>
> They nothing at all like the various representations of sign 20 on
> pp.84-85.
ANOTHER LIE of yours !.. "The FALSE drawing of EVANS has NOT BEEN
REPRODUCED on pages 84 and 85" ! What has been reproduced is the REAL
DRAWING of the SIGN !..
WHERE IS THE "CHEATING", repeated again and again by Franz ?????
>
> Now the task is to find a clear enough photo of side B. Et
> c'est pas de la tarte.
>
> (Quant à toi, grapheus, on ne t'a pas sonné. Retourne sous le bureau
> d'Hurluberlu tailler des plumes à Mein Kampf)
Ha,ha,ha !... You don't like that I put my finger on your LIES, right
?... Allez, va jouer avec ton petit camarade Franz au jeu du
menteur...
grapheus
- Next message: Jacques Guy: "Re: Phaistos Disk side B = brain rotter"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Chinese dictation"
- In reply to: Jacques Guy: "Phaistos Disk side B"
- Next in thread: Rolleston: "Re: Phaistos Disk side B"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
