Re: Marie Jean Faucounau sues me for at least 8,487 Swiss Francs

From: Franz Gnaedinger (frgn_at_bluemail.ch)
Date: 11/22/04 

Date: 22 Nov 2004 08:05:55 -0800

frgn@bluemail.ch (Franz Gnaedinger) wrote in message news:<2bf25455.0411212338.5665938e@posting.google.com>...

Peter T. Daniels: I apologize for my f a l s e accusation:
 
> Peter T. Daniels: you are wrong. I wrote on the Phaistos Disk
> in the Usenet long before grapheus popped up. In fact I explained
> to Jean Faucounau in November of 1999 how to join sci.archaeology
> where he might find other people to discuss with and explain his
> views that are very different from mine. I am for different views,
> for a democratic forum. grapheus is the one, who, avec son
> comportement vieux enfant gâté vieux enfant raté (pour ne pas dire
> fasciste) allows just one opinion and has to deride every other
> view and molest and defame and stalk me for years. Peter T. Daniels:
> if you participate in a discussion, you should read more carefully
> and write less. You can't score by the daily number of messages.
> Right, Peter T. Daniels?

You are absolutely right, while I was completely wrong! By "here"
you meant: here in sci.lang, while I understood: here in the Usenet.
I am the one who should have read your message including the quote
more carefully! Please accept my apologies. You wrote in my favor
and then I write such a reply. I am the silly dog that fell into
a hole and bites the hand of the one who helps me out ... Please
go on writing as many replies as you ever like to. You are doing
a fine job keeping sci.lang in shape, together with a couple of
regulars. I estimate you for your knowledge and integrity, and
when I called you king of sci.lang it was out of respect, spiced
with just a few grains of irony ... I am a little shaky these days,
what with the imminent ruin of my existence. Please accept this
as my excuse for the false accusation.

For those who read my previous messages: the woman whom I am
teaching for a relief organisation (for free, I am no Faucounau
Rochaix grapheus), who suffers from a discalculy and calculates

   twelve minus one equals one

stood her exams, and as the only one of her class! everyone else
fell through! all the ones who laughed at her fell through.

Previously I gave lessons to a young fugitive from Afghanistan,
for four and a half years, and for the same relief organization.
He stood his final exams in past spring. 60 per cent fell through,
3 of 5 young men, some for the second or even for the third time,
while he succeeded at first attempt.

So I finished these missions of mine, just in time for being
ruined by my long-time stalker grapheus and his expensive lawyer
Dr. Marcel Rochaix www.ekbt-law.ch

   Franz Gnaedinger www.seshat.ch

> A lesson in Swiss history, for Dr. Marcel Rochaix www.ekbt-law.ch
>
> Hundred years ago Switzerland was poor. Many farmers were forced
> to leave their homes and cross the Atlantic Ocean and build new
> homes in the USA, in Brazil, and in other countries overseas.
>
> Switzerland was in acute danger at the begin of World War II,
> especially in the spring of 1940, when German divisions gathered
> behind the Jura mountain range in eastern France. Now General
> Guisan had a clever idea: he positioned most of his troops in
> and around the metropoles of Basel and Zurich. The Germans could
> easily have conquered Switzerland; however, they would have been
> forced to bomb these cities, thus destroying plants, schools,
> hospitals, banks, and to kill many of the well instructed workers
> - very well trained and attuned to each other -, who were doing
> their service in the Swiss militia army. Switzerland resembles
> one of those fine watches we were famous for in those times:
> small and running smoothly. Apart from water we have little
> resources, and so the only true value of Switzerland is our
> fine organization. By bombing Basel and Zurich and killing many
> of those well trained workers the Germans would have destroyed
> the very value that would have been worth an attack. What remains
> if one tramples upon a mechanic watch? broken glass, bended
> hands and springs. Well, the German divisons withdrew, allegedly
> singing the verses
>
> Die Schweiz das kleine Stachelschwein
> Nehmen wir im Rueckzug ein
>
> We shall conquer the small porcupine Switzerland when we have
> conquered all of Europe. And then they would ahve got our country
> undamaged. Luckily enough, the Germans were beaten before this
> happened, and so we survived unharmed.
>
> However, we had to pay a price for our relative peace: while
> the men guarded the borders, and saved many fugitives against
> the strict orders of the authorities, the higher management
> of many a firm collaborated at least partially with the Nazis.
>
> My generation - i was born 1949 - has no reason to judge the
> generation of our parents. They were surrounded by the Nazis
> in Germany, France and Austria and the fascists in Italy.
> The generation of my parents led a hard life and had no idea
> of what went on in the management of those firms.
>
> My generation was lucky, we were born when the war was over,
> economy flourished, and a strong movement against war coming
> from America, Berkley, folk singers like Bob Dylan, flower power,
> the May 1968 in Paris, brought a freedom we had never known
> before. Life changed completely. We, the post-war baby boomers
> of Switzerland, are the ones who profited most from World War II,
> to say it pointedly, and a double moral was beginning to spread
> in our country. The banks haul in money by wagonloads. We are
> protesting against black money (nowadays coming in mostly via
> para-banking: trustees and lawyers), but we are nevertheless
> profiting from all that money.
>
> In the early 1980s, Sigmund Widmer, Jewish, former mayor of
> Zurich, by then a national consultant, wrote in a weekly paper:
> Switzerland can only survive if we turn our working place into
> a thinking place. Nobody cared about his advice. Let us turn
> Switzerland into an exclusive financial place, the International
> River of Money will flow forever through our small country and
> irrigate our fields ...
>
> In 1996, America forced Switzerland to face our conduct during
> World War 2. That was long overdue, but raised a wave of protest
> and a still most virulent anti-Americanism in our small country.
>
> We are the best in the world, we have nothing to do with any
> war anywhere; just protect us and give us the cheap oil and
> leave us in peace. We are for peace. We are the good ones.
> (We owe our security to the USA and the cheap oil to their
> geopolitics. Ninety per cent of the oil from the Persian Gulf
> is bound for Europe. No blood for oil. Just the oil, please.
> Our affluent society got nothing to do with the sad state
> of other countries. What can we for dictators who rob their
> peoples and send the money into our number accounts?)
>
> And Sigmund Widmer's wise advice is still being ignored. 700
> young scientists (Tagesanzeiger) or 400 to 500 brillant young
> scientists per year (Sonntagszeitung) are leaving Switzerland.
> They get no chance here. Why care about scientists and new ideas?
> The money comes in just by itself; all we have to do is keeping
> our hands open. And those like me, who are living most modestly
> and working for a prospering global society can just be ruined.
>
> Franz Gnaedinger Zurich www.seshat.ch

Quantcast