Re: Languages in Europe - Who understands what ?
From: devil (devil_at_attglobal.net)
Date: 11/27/04
- Next message: devil: "Re: Languages in Europe - Who understands what ?"
- Previous message: Rolleston: "Re: Marie Jean Faucounau sues me for at least 8,487 Swiss Francs"
- In reply to: Wiktor S.: "Re: Languages in Europe - Who understands what ?"
- Next in thread: Wiktor S.: "Re: Languages in Europe - Who understands what ?"
- Reply: Wiktor S.: "Re: Languages in Europe - Who understands what ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 22:30:18 GMT
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 22:51:30 +0100, Wiktor S. wrote:
>>> By and large, Quebec rediscovered their language over the last thirty
>>> years, and came back from a very bastardized French to a more
>>> neutral one.
>>
>> Following your logic, English is a very "bastardized" French and
>> Afrikaans is the very bastardized Dutch. I don't see how the word may
>> be applied to languages.
>
> If English is bastardized French, and Quebecian is bastardized French, may I
> say the latter is "English Mk2"? :-)
Who is it whom you are trying to provoke? :-)
- Next message: devil: "Re: Languages in Europe - Who understands what ?"
- Previous message: Rolleston: "Re: Marie Jean Faucounau sues me for at least 8,487 Swiss Francs"
- In reply to: Wiktor S.: "Re: Languages in Europe - Who understands what ?"
- Next in thread: Wiktor S.: "Re: Languages in Europe - Who understands what ?"
- Reply: Wiktor S.: "Re: Languages in Europe - Who understands what ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]