Re: Seen on aus.legal

From: Peter T. Daniels (grammatim_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 12/01/04 

Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 13:40:14 GMT

Your claim was that "caveatted" is not specific to Australian
jurisprudence, but is current in US patent law.

You were incorrect.

Someone apparently familiar with US patent law even said so.

Instead of simply retiring from the thread, you try to justify your data
as relevant, but they aren't. 

-- 
Peter T. Daniels                       grammatim@att.net
Quantcast