Re: Your vote on a common global language
From: Miguel Cruz (mnc_at_admin.u.nu)
Date: 12/05/04
- Next message: Miguel Cruz: "Re: Your vote on a common global language"
- Previous message: Paul J Kriha: "Re: Your vote on a common global language"
- In reply to: I Am What I Am: "Re: Your vote on a common global language"
- Next in thread: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Your vote on a common global language"
- Reply: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Your vote on a common global language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 23:34:49 -0600
I Am What I Am <iamwhatiam@gmail.com> wrote:
> windsor <none@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Any sentence in Chinese will take far longer to write than the English
>> equivalent.
>
> I think otherwise, because a single hieroglyph may substitute an
> English word of so many letters. In English you need 6 letters to
> write mother, in Chinese you need only one hieroglyph to write the
> same.
Now count the strokes in the Chinese character versus the strokes in the
corresponding English word. Make sure you take a fair number of words, as
extremely basic words like "mother" will tend to favor Chinese. And also
include a time penalty for the additional precision required to make the
Chinese characters actually legible.
miguel
-- Hit The Road! Photos from 32 countries on 5 continents: http://travel.u.nu
- Next message: Miguel Cruz: "Re: Your vote on a common global language"
- Previous message: Paul J Kriha: "Re: Your vote on a common global language"
- In reply to: I Am What I Am: "Re: Your vote on a common global language"
- Next in thread: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Your vote on a common global language"
- Reply: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Your vote on a common global language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|