Re: Your vote on a common global language
From: Miguel Cruz (mnc_at_admin.u.nu)
Date: 12/05/04
- Next message: Douglas G. Kilday: "Re: Hindi and Farsi counting words are identical"
- Previous message: Miguel Cruz: "Re: Your vote on a common global language"
- In reply to: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Your vote on a common global language"
- Next in thread: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Your vote on a common global language"
- Reply: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Your vote on a common global language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 12:58:58 -0600
Lee Sau Dan <danlee@informatik.uni-freiburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>> "Miguel" == Miguel Cruz <mnc@admin.u.nu> writes:
> Miguel> And also include a time penalty for the additional
> Miguel> precision required to make the Chinese characters actually
> Miguel> legible.
>
> I don't think it is more difficult than making sure you write the 6
> letters "mother" legibly. I write both words (Chinese and English for
> "mother") in approx. the same amount of time.
Yes, but like I said, "mother" is one of those words where Chinese is terser
than average. Now try it with "limp" or "stash".
miguel
-- Hit The Road! Photos from 32 countries on 5 continents: http://travel.u.nu
- Next message: Douglas G. Kilday: "Re: Hindi and Farsi counting words are identical"
- Previous message: Miguel Cruz: "Re: Your vote on a common global language"
- In reply to: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Your vote on a common global language"
- Next in thread: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Your vote on a common global language"
- Reply: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Your vote on a common global language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading