Re: Gay lisp

From: Arnold Zwicky (zwicky_at_Turing.Stanford.EDU)
Date: 12/06/04 

Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 19:29:12 +0000 (UTC)

in article <41B3CE51.67D1103C@sonic.net>, reinhold (rey) aman
<aman@sonic.net> tells us:

>Pieter Z. wrote:

>> Reinhold (Rey) Aman wrote:

>> > "I, PETER T. DANIELS, AM AN EFFEMINATE HOMOSEXUAL!"

>> > ... Comments? By Aman-tolerating non-bitches only, s.v.p.

>> Well the obvious question would be what's wrong with
>> being an effeminate homosexual.

>Nothing, Pieter. Some of my best friends are effeminate
>homosexuals.

oh, honey! i think it's just *fabulous* that you have friends who are
effeminate homosexuals! that's so *generous* and *tolerant* of you!
they must feel very warm and *validated* that you treat them as *good*
effeminate homosexuals, as opposed to those *nasty* effeminate
homosexuals (like the peter daniels you imagine). the world is surely
a better place for having strong manly fellows like you who are
willing to befriend faggots (of the right sort).

>My point was that homosexuality can be shown or betrayed by the
>*language* used (i.e., no lisping is necessary)...

"betrayed" is a telling choice of words.

arnold