Re: Gay lisp

From: Peter T. Daniels (grammatim_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 12/06/04 

Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 22:59:42 GMT

Mxsmanic wrote:
>
> Peter T. Daniels writes:
>
> > By that definition, your (deleted) statement was correct.
>
> I know.
>
> > But irrelevant.
>
> Then why did you ask about it?

Because if you had used the word in its ordinary sense, it would have
been further evidence of your bigotry. 

-- 
Peter T. Daniels                       grammatim@att.net

Relevant Pages