Re: Speaking without a foreign accent
From: Mxsmanic (mxsmanic_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 12/07/04
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Speaking without a foreign accent"
- Previous message: frgn_at_bluemail.ch: "Bill Gates, won't you buy the Usenet archives?"
- In reply to: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: Speaking without a foreign accent"
- Next in thread: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Speaking without a foreign accent"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 21:39:32 +0100
Ruud Harmsen writes:
> >Miguel Carrasquer writes:
> >
> >> Studies such as the one at:
> >> <http://psychology.binghamton.edu/Faculty/flapcorpus.pdf>
> >> show that the vowel is longer (avg. 111 vs. 95 ms) in ladder
> >> than in latter, so at least a narrow transcription [l&.r*R]
> >> vs. [l&r*R] seems justified.
> >
> >That doesn't make it a phonemic difference.
>
> OK, so there is a systematic phonetic difference, there is a meaning
> difference, but the difference is not phonemic.
I don't see any mention of a meaning different in the backquoted
statements to which I responded.
-- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Speaking without a foreign accent"
- Previous message: frgn_at_bluemail.ch: "Bill Gates, won't you buy the Usenet archives?"
- In reply to: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: Speaking without a foreign accent"
- Next in thread: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Speaking without a foreign accent"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]