Re: Speaking without a foreign accent
From: Mxsmanic (mxsmanic_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 12/07/04
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Gay lisp"
- Previous message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Speaking without a foreign accent"
- In reply to: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Speaking without a foreign accent"
- Next in thread: Rolleston: "Re: Speaking without a foreign accent"
- Reply: Rolleston: "Re: Speaking without a foreign accent"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 21:41:31 +0100
Peter T. Daniels writes:
> It does if the speakers can tell which word was intended, but I don't
> know that they can.
It's unlikely that such a difference would be required, since the two
words are unlikely to form minimal pairs themselves in complete
utterances (given their dramatically different meanings and uses).
In other words, it's hard to think of two meaningful and plausible
sentences that differ only in the presence of "ladder" in place of
"latter."
-- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Gay lisp"
- Previous message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Speaking without a foreign accent"
- In reply to: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Speaking without a foreign accent"
- Next in thread: Rolleston: "Re: Speaking without a foreign accent"
- Reply: Rolleston: "Re: Speaking without a foreign accent"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|