Re: Bilingualism has ruined Canada but there is still hope.
From: Mxsmanic (mxsmanic_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 12/15/04
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Bilingualism has ruined Canada but there is still hope."
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: punctuation and English/ other languages"
- In reply to: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Bilingualism has ruined Canada but there is still hope."
- Next in thread: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: Bilingualism has ruined Canada but there is still hope."
- Reply: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: Bilingualism has ruined Canada but there is still hope."
- Reply: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Bilingualism has ruined Canada but there is still hope."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:42:46 +0100
Lee Sau Dan writes:
> Why not?
Because if people are fluent in two languages, one of them becomes
redundant.
> It could be the case that the country has one common
> national language, and then each region has its local language.
Then everyone is not bilingual at the national level.
> Modern China is an example, with
> Standard Mandarin being the common national language.
If everyone in China spoke standard Mandarin and standard Cantonese, one
of the two would rapidly disappear in favor of the other (probably the
one with more speakers outside China).
-- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Bilingualism has ruined Canada but there is still hope."
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: punctuation and English/ other languages"
- In reply to: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Bilingualism has ruined Canada but there is still hope."
- Next in thread: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: Bilingualism has ruined Canada but there is still hope."
- Reply: Ruud Harmsen: "Re: Bilingualism has ruined Canada but there is still hope."
- Reply: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Bilingualism has ruined Canada but there is still hope."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]