Re: Grammatical Recursion
From: Lee Sau Dan (danlee_at_informatik.uni-freiburg.de)
Date: 12/18/04
- Next message: Brian M. Scott: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Previous message: Brian M. Scott: "Re: what language is it?"
- In reply to: Florian Laws: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Next in thread: Florian Laws: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Reply: Florian Laws: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 18 Dec 2004 23:25:26 +0800
>>>>> "Florian" == Florian Laws <fl-usenet-2004@void.s.bawue.de> writes:
[Ackerman function]
>> To rewrite this "iteratively" would surely involve
>> hand-management of a stack, which might as well be recursion.
Florian> I does, but that only shows that Iteration is in fact
Florian> just as powerful as Recursion.
Using a stack in an iteration cheats by adding recursive power to it,
thereby upgrading it to recursion. The additional power of recursion
over iteration lies in the (implicit) unbounded stack.
--
Lee Sau Dan §õ¦u´° ~{@nJX6X~}
E-mail: danlee@informatik.uni-freiburg.de
Home page: http://www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~danlee
- Next message: Brian M. Scott: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Previous message: Brian M. Scott: "Re: what language is it?"
- In reply to: Florian Laws: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Next in thread: Florian Laws: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Reply: Florian Laws: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|