Re: Grammatical Recursion
From: Florian Laws (fl-usenet-2004_at_void.s.bawue.de)
Date: 12/19/04
- Next message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Google Beta mangles ASCII-IPA"
- Previous message: Greg Lee: "Re: What is branching"
- In reply to: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Next in thread: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Reply: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 19 Dec 2004 14:18:45 GMT
On 2004-12-18, Lee Sau Dan <danlee@informatik.uni-freiburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>> "Florian" == Florian Laws <fl-usenet-2004@void.s.bawue.de> writes:
>
> [Ackerman function]
> >> To rewrite this "iteratively" would surely involve
> >> hand-management of a stack, which might as well be recursion.
>
> Florian> I does, but that only shows that Iteration is in fact
> Florian> just as powerful as Recursion.
>
> Using a stack in an iteration cheats by adding recursive power to it,
> thereby upgrading it to recursion. The additional power of recursion
> over iteration lies in the (implicit) unbounded stack.
Well, computability theory doesn't care if you think of it as cheating.
Regards,
Florian
- Next message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Google Beta mangles ASCII-IPA"
- Previous message: Greg Lee: "Re: What is branching"
- In reply to: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Next in thread: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Reply: Lee Sau Dan: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|