Re: Google Beta mangles ASCII-IPA
From: Jukka K. Korpela (jkorpela_at_cs.tut.fi)
Date: 12/19/04
- Next message: G*rd*n: "Re: Our Moral Values"
- Previous message: Florian Laws: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- In reply to: Reinhold (Rey) Aman: "Re: Google Beta mangles ASCII-IPA"
- Next in thread: Aidan Kehoe: "Re: Google Beta mangles ASCII-IPA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 14:47:05 +0000 (UTC)
"Reinhold (Rey) Aman" <aman@sonic.net> wrote:
> You may be in the minority if you use "US-ASCII"
Surely not, if you mean the _character repertoire_, which is what
really matters here.
> (unless that's the
> same as "Western" and "Latin 1").
It's not. But the character repertoire ASCII is a subset of virtually
all character sets in use.
> Your header shows that you're
> using "charset=ISO-8859-1," the very same character set I
> recommended.
The charset (character encoding) isn't the issue really - as far as the
codes of ASCII characters are the same as in ASCII, as they are in all
charsets discussed here.
> So I don't understand your problem or objection to my
> recommendation.
What I objected to was saying utf-8 was the problem. The problem is the
use of characters outside the ASCII repertoire.
Followups trimmed (since this is even more off-topic on a.u.e.).
-- Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
- Next message: G*rd*n: "Re: Our Moral Values"
- Previous message: Florian Laws: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- In reply to: Reinhold (Rey) Aman: "Re: Google Beta mangles ASCII-IPA"
- Next in thread: Aidan Kehoe: "Re: Google Beta mangles ASCII-IPA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|