Re: Ring a bell to you ?

From: grapheus (grapheus_at_www.com)
Date: 12/20/04 

Date: 20 Dec 2004 05:30:52 -0800

Alan Crozier wrote:
> <grapheus@www.com> wrote in message
> news:1103534749.090356.68880@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > O.H. wrote:
> > > On 29 Nov 2004 21:52:37 GMT, Philip Deitiker
<Nopdeitik@att.net.Spam>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >In sci.archaeology, Dylan Sung created a message ID
> > > >news:310sk3F35jb15U4@uni-berlin.de:
> > > >
> > > >> Good, now let's look at Faucounau's book, for which grapheus
> > > > > is the esteemed
> > > >> proponent on usenet. If as grapheus says, time and time
> > > > > again, the method
> > > >> is not important to the decipherment of the Phaistos disk,
> > > > > then is it
> > > >> possible to say it is the "ONLY ONE PROVEN" decipherment?
> > > > > How does it
> > > >> invalidate all the other fifty or so decipherments?
> > > >
> >
> > Very easy to answer :
> > For THE SAME motive that the Earth is a SPHERE and not a CUBE or a
> > CYLINDER !.. (Whatever the METHOD the conclusion that it is a
sphere
> > has been reached !)
> > i.e. in this case, BECAUSE the PROTO-IONIC SOLUTION is PROVED by
more
> > 30 pieces of EVIDENCE, when there is NONE for the 40 or 50 OTHER
> > proposed solutions of the problem !!!
>
> Just a shame that no one believes JF's decipherment except you and
Inger.

THAT IS WHAT *YOU* say !..
In fact, the "Proto-Ionian Theory" , which is the consequence of the
decipherment, has been praised by a lot of specialists in the field.
Here is, for instance, a short extract of one recent review (in French.
Translation is mine) : "With this theory (= the Proto-Ionian
Theory),... similarities are no coincidences anymore, and lots of names
(of peoples and locations) become very significant.."

But Alan-the-craziest IGNORES that. He has NEVER been a specialist in
anytthing, but in SLANDER and IGNARROGANCE !..

grapheus