Re: Ring a bell to you ?
From: Peter T. Daniels (grammatim_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 12/20/04
- Next message: Tak To: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Previous message: grapheus: "Re: Ring a bell to you ?"
- In reply to: grapheus: "Re: Ring a bell to you ?"
- Next in thread: grapheus: "Re: Ring a bell to you ?"
- Reply: grapheus: "Re: Ring a bell to you ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 13:46:45 GMT
grapheus wrote:
> In fact, the "Proto-Ionian Theory" , which is the consequence of the
> decipherment, has been praised by a lot of specialists in the field.
> Here is, for instance, a short extract of one recent review (in French.
> Translation is mine) : "With this theory (= the Proto-Ionian
> Theory),... similarities are no coincidences anymore, and lots of names
> (of peoples and locations) become very significant.."
Name the reviewer and state his or her credentials.
And the passage you quote does not say whether the reviewer _accepts_
the theory. Everyone will agree to the statement you have presented
here, whether they believe the theory or not.
-- Peter T. Daniels grammatim@att.net
- Next message: Tak To: "Re: Grammatical Recursion"
- Previous message: grapheus: "Re: Ring a bell to you ?"
- In reply to: grapheus: "Re: Ring a bell to you ?"
- Next in thread: grapheus: "Re: Ring a bell to you ?"
- Reply: grapheus: "Re: Ring a bell to you ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|